Search WillRabbe.com:

 

Social Media:

 

Navigate Site:

 

This site is powered by:

Powered by Squarespace
This form does not yet contain any fields.

    Blog

    Anecdotal Observations On History & Politics

    Wednesday
    Apr202011

    The Hamilton-Burr Duel & The Hair Trigger Theory

    The infamous Alexander Hamilton/ Aaron Burr duel in Weehawken New Jersey that led to Hamilton's untimely death may have been a result of a little-known hair-trigger in the dueling pistols that was atypical of dueling pistols at the time. Allegedly, Hamilton provided the pistols to be used, not disclosing that the triggers were much more sensitive, theoretically hoping that he could fire off a shot before Burr, who was known as a good shot. The scheme backfired, as Hamilton shot prematurely, well before he had taken aim, allowing Burr to take his time to aim and fire. 

    The hair triggers were discovered in 1976, 172 years after the famous confrontation, when the pistols were examined. A Smithsonian magazine article describes the investigation here. Many recall when the duel was more contemporarily popularized in the very first "Got Milk" ad in 1993, which depicted a Burr/ Hamilton enthusiast who could not answer a radio quiz question because his mouth was full of peanut butter:

    And, saving the best for last, there's an excellent short film on the subject - a modern take, from Aaron Burr's perspective: 

    Aaron Burr, Part 2 from Dana O'Keefe on Vimeo.

    Friday
    Apr152011

    2012 GOP Primaries & The Republican Theory of Ascension

    With the exception of George W. Bush in 2000 and Gerald Ford in 1976, Republicans have historically nominated a candidate in the GOP Primary field who has run for president in the past. While the explanation of this phenomenon is unclear, many have suggested  that the party tends to favor the candidate "next in line", or perhaps those who have run previously have achieved greater name recognition and thus they fare better the next time around. Whatever the reason, the GOP's "Laws of Ascention" have borne out in nearly every nomination battle since Eisenhower:

    • 2008: John McCain (previously ran in 2000)
    • 1996: Bob Dole (previously ran in 1988)
    • 1988: George H. W. Bush (previously ran in 1980)
    • 1980: Ronald Reagan (previously ran in 1976, and even in 1968)
    • 1968: Richard Nixon (previously ran in 1960)
    • 1964: Barry Goldwater (who had technically run previously, having challenged Nixon on the floor of the 1960 convention)

    To be clear, the above list only includes the nominees when there was an open campaign for the nomination, not the reelection years of sitting republican president. 

    Since his loss to John McCain in 2008, many have cited this logic to speculate that Mitt Romney has a good chance in 2012. Mark Halperin stated this on Hardball on Friday that the GOP has, "always picked the person whose turn it is, and there's no one who's got a greater claim to that than Romney."

    However, there is another potential candidate who would have a greater claim to that. Romney had secured a total of 271 delegates in the primaries when he withdraw in early February, whereas Mike Huckabee won 278 delegates -- Mike Huckabee was actually the runner-up in 2008. (In fact, after Huckabee's insurgent victory over Romney in Iowa, he came within striking distance of McCain in South Carolina, losing by only 3.3% in the Palmetto State).

    While Huckabee hasn't indicated that he will run again in 2012, the Republican this theory would seem to also favor his candidacy -- but nobody appears to ever mention that -- pundits only refer to Romney in the context of the "next in line" argument. 

    What's also interesting about this theory is that Democrats rarely like candidates who have previously run --preferring dark horse candidates to those who have competed in a previous election cycle.

    Friday
    Apr152011

    Vanity Fair's "Impossible Interview" between Calvin Coolidge and Greta Garbo

    In it's first incarnation (from 1913 to 1936) Conde Nast's Vanity Fair published an imaginary conversation between two notoriously tight-lipped public figures, President Calvin Coolidge and actress Greta Garbo. Awkward much? 

     

    Friday
    Apr152011

    Contradictory Views of Roosevelt as a Trustbuster

    Much like how President Obama faces criticism from conservatives as well as disaffected progressives and liberals, Teddy Roosevelt faced similar circumstances when it came to trusts -- below are two cartoons, one from Life Magazine depicting TR as protecting the trusts and a Puck cartoon showing him combat them: